Saga links your pages beautifully. Stop making the pages first.
Saga is fast, clean, and already says the words — “connected knowledge.” But its auto-link matches the page titles you typed, so you still make and name the pages before anything can connect. Dump your pile raw and Naumu maps the meaning across it — no page to create, no title to match.
Why it holds up
A real map from raw scraps, traceable, and yours from any assistant.
It connects meaning, not titles
Saga’s auto-link catches two pages when their titles match — so you had to make both pages and name them alike. Naumu reads raw, untitled dumps and links the things in them by what they mean, so two scraps that share a cause finally meet.
Every answer carries a receipt
Ask in plain language and the answer comes back with the note and timestamp it came from. Nothing invented, nothing floating free of where you said it — trace any fact back to the scrap that produced it.
Bring your Saga notes — just drag them in
There’s no Saga connector, and you don’t need one. Export your Saga pages and drop the files in; Naumu reads them and builds a connected map. Keep Saga open in the other tab while you decide — nothing is moved or deleted there.
The honest comparison
Where each tool actually wins.
A rigged table fools no one, and Saga is good enough that rigging it would be obvious. Here’s the real split — including the rows you should pick Saga for.
Capture
Make a page, title it, write in it — then it can link.
Dump it raw — type, paste, drag, talk. No page, no title; it connects it after.
How things connect
Auto-link matches the page titles you typed, the way you typed them.
Relationships inferred from meaning across raw, untitled dumps — not string-matched titles.
What you get to open
A fast set of linked docs and tasks.
A real connected map of the things in your pile and how they actually relate.
Asking your knowledge
Ask the AI about pages you made and @-mentioned.
Ask across everything you dumped; answers come from real connections, no mentions needed.
Reconnecting old scraps
Two untitled scraps that share a cause never meet — you didn’t make the pages.
Reads both and links them by the cause they share, even months apart.
Where a fact came from
You trust the page you wrote.
Every answer comes with a receipt — the source note and timestamp attached.
Your AI assistant
A good assistant that lives inside Saga — it can’t reach your own ChatGPT or Claude.
Your own ChatGPT and Claude read and write the same brain over MCP — as you, and reversible.
Real-time team collaboration
Genuinely strong — fast multiplayer editing, comments, a shared workspace.
First-person singular today; built for one brain, not a shared workspace.
Writing & editing docs
Clean, fast, pleasant editor; great for linked documents and drafting.
Built to be asked, not to be a polished writing surface.
Team plans & price
Free for up to 3 people; cheap, simple per-seat paid plans.
Anonymous-first for one person — build before you sign up; no team seats yet.
Trying it
Friendly free tier, but you make pages before it’s useful.
No signup to try; nothing saved until you keep, so the trial costs you nothing.
If your real job is collaborating with a small team in a fast, clean shared workspace — drafting docs together, keeping linked notes and tasks tidy in one place — use Saga. It’s genuinely good at that, it’s cheap, and 60,000+ people aren’t wrong to like it. Naumu is for the other thing: dumping the mess you’d never make a page for, getting a real map out of it without lifting a finger, and asking it the cross-everything questions that title-matching can’t reach.
FAQ
Switching from Saga, honestly.
Compare Naumu with other tools
Stop making pages. Start asking.
Export your Saga notes and drag them in, paste a messy scrap, or just start with a sentence. Naumu reads it, connects it by meaning, and from then on you ask instead of file.